The Ambassador of the LPR in Russia said that hundreds of civilians could remain at Azot

Earlier, Ramzan Kadyrov announced the withdrawal of all civilians who remained at the Azot plant in Severodonetsk. But, according to Rodion Miroshnik, those who came out reported that there could be hundreds more people at the enterprise

On the territory of the blocked chemical plant Azot Hundreds of civilians may remain in Severodonetsk, LPR Ambassador to Russia Rodion Miroshnik said on Telegram, referring to people evacuated from the enterprise.

“Some of those who went out said that there could be hundreds more civilians in shelters that do not communicate with each other. According to them, the militants did not have access to many of the shelters and tried in various ways to pull civilians out of the dungeons, — he wrote.

Earlier on June 25, the head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, reported that Russian and LPR forces had withdrawn all civilians remaining there from the plant.

According to Miroshnik, the evacuation has now been suspended due to shelling from Lisichansk. “After cleaning up the Azot industrial zone” Allied troops found civilians in the shelters of the enterprise. They have already received water, food and medicine. Some of the civilians managed to leave both the shelters and the territory of the enterprise, but a significant part remains in place. Resumed shelling prevents the exit, — he explained. The evacuation will continue “as soon as security permits.”

In early May, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported that the Ukrainian military had deployed on the territory of “Azot” heavy weapons and hold more than a thousand employees of the enterprise and local residents “as a” human shield “.

Later, the military stationed at the plant was blocked. Miroshnik reported that the number of civilians hiding on Azot is unknown.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Stop cluttering up the warehouse: building a purchasing system in six steps Pro instructions Waiting for clarity: will warehouse rent become cheaper in 2022 Articles Pro How to deal with the impostor syndrome in five steps Instructions Pro Emotional hunger: what it is and how it leads to Overeating Articles Pro The Ultimate Guide to OFZs: Which Papers Will Save You From Inflation Today healthy habits of Jeff Bezos Articles

On June 12, civilians began to leave the factory, the LPR ambassador reported. “Through the second checkpoint of the Azot chemical association” civilians began to leave. This checkpoint is not controlled by militants. They are met and taken to a safe place by the fighters of the allied forces, — he explained.

On June 25, the Ministry of Defense declared full control over Severodonetsk and the suppression of the last center of resistance at Azot.

Authors Tags


Russia hands over examples of Zelensky’s ‘hate speech’ to UN

The document handed over to the Security Council and the UN General Assembly lists examples of “hate speech” by Ukrainian politicians, including President Volodymyr Zelensky and ex-President Petro Poroshenko

Russia circulated as an official document in the Security Council and the UN General Assembly compilation of “hate speech” Ukrainian politicians and public figures, Dmitry Polyansky, First Deputy Representative of Russia to the UN, said on his Telegram channel.

“As we promised during our speech at the UN Security Council on June 21, the Russian Permanent Mission to the UN circulated as official document of the UN Security Council and General Assembly, a selection of some hate speeches by Ukrainian politicians and public figures of Ukraine”, — he wrote.

The diplomat also attached a relevant document to his post. Among others, it cites the words of Volodymyr Zelensky dated November 29, 2021, where he speaks about people who were subjected to NSDC sanctions. “And you call them people? There are different. There are human representatives. Not all representatives of people— people. There are individuals, I think so, — he said then.

In addition, the permanent mission recalled the words of ex-President Petro Poroshenko on November 13, 2014 about the residents of the DPR and LPR. "We will have a job— They dont have. We will have pensions— They dont have. We will take care of pensioners, children— They dont have. Our children will go to schools and kindergartens— their children will be in basements <…> This is how we will win this war,— said Poroshenko then.

The words of Alexander Turchinov dated February 24, 2022 are also mentioned, who stated that he was ready to “destroy Russia wherever possible.” At the same time, he urged “to beat Rusnya” not only in Ukraine, but also abroad— on Russian territory. The circulated document contains quotes from many other Ukrainian representatives.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Three useful exercises to help beat shyness Instructions Pro OCD: what is this disorder and how it is treated Articles Pro How to care for skin after 35 years: 5 important rules Instructions Pro 46 thousand people lost their money. How the Cryptocurrency Market Crashed to the “resistance economy” Research

Russia has repeatedly accused the Ukrainian authorities of “genocide” population of Donbass. President Vladimir Putin, announcing the start of a special operation in Ukraine on the night of February 24, said that its main goal was to protect people who “are subjected to bullying, genocide by the Kyiv regime.” “And for this we will strive for the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine. As well as bringing to justice those who committed numerous bloody crimes against civilians, including citizens of the Russian Federation, — noted by the head of state.

After the start of the special operation in Ukraine, proposals to abandon the “Russian heritage”, including the renaming of streets, squares, parks, cultural and other objects, began to sound more often. So, in April, the mayor of Kyiv, Vitaliy Klitschko, promised to rename the streets and stations in the Ukrainian capital, the names of which are associated with Russia.

Also, in mid-June, a working group of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine published a decision to exclude Russian works from the school curriculum. literature. In particular, the Ukrainian authorities intend to exclude from the program the fables of Ivan Krylov, the novels of Anton Chekhov, Fyodor Dostoevsky and some works by Nikolai Gogol. its future and takes itself out of the brackets of world history, refusing the heritage of Russian culture. The head of the Ministry of Education, Sergei Kravtsov, noted that “this is another confirmation of the stupidity of the Kyiv regime,” since the heritage of Russian culture “cannot be deleted from history.”

Authors Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone


The Ministry of Culture banned the export of exhibits from Russia to foreign exhibitions

The temporary export of art objects has been suspended since the beginning of March, they are planned to be sent to exhibitions in friendly countries from next year

The Ministry of Culture does not issue permits for the temporary export of exhibits from Russia, the press service of the department reported.

“The Ministry of Culture of Russia suspended the temporary issue and temporary export of museum items from the territory of the Russian Federation on March 3rd. The corresponding letter was then sent to all subordinate museums,— RBC was informed in the press service.

They added that the export of art objects to exhibitions in friendly countries will resume from 2023.

The agency clarified that 1,500 exhibits from exhibitions in Europe, the United Arab Emirates, Japan, Oman, and Belarus were returned to Russia. The department, together with other departments, is working to return other Russian exhibits.

The Hermitage announced a moratorium on exhibitions in Europe and the United States until the end of the year. The museum stated that all of its exhibits have returned from exhibitions. The Hermitage recalled that in the 1990s, such a measure was taken in relation to exhibitions inside the country for security reasons.

At the end of May, Mikhail Shvydkoy, the president's special envoy for international cultural cooperation, expressed the opinion that art objects from the Russian museum fund “should stay at home for some time.” In his opinion, now it is better to accept exhibitions than to send exhibits abroad until the situation becomes “calmer”.

Read on RBC Pro Pro From magazine to airline: we read “Losing my virginity” by Richard Branson people have lost their money. How the crypto-currency market collapsed : Healthy Habits by Jeff Bezos Articles Pro OCD: what is it and how it is treated Articles Pro “Send me this ASAP. ATP in advance”: phrases are the enemies of effective correspondence Instructions Authors Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone


The head of the IEA invited Europe to prepare for a complete shutdown of gas by Russia

Russia's decision to cut gas supplies to European countries may be a harbinger of further cuts, as Moscow hopes to gain “leverage” in this way, says the head of the International Energy Agency

Europe must immediately prepare for a complete cessation of Russian gas exports this winter, says Fatih Birol, head of the International Energy Agency (IEA). He said this in an interview with the Financial Times (FT).

“Europe must be prepared for the fact that Russian gas will be completely cut off,” — Birol said. “The closer we get to winter, the more we understand Russia's intentions. I believe the shutdown [of gas] is intended to keep Europe from filling up storage facilities and to increase Russia's leverage during the winter months,” — added the head of the IEA.

According to him, the organization invites European governments to take measures to reduce domestic demand for gas to support the operation of aging nuclear power plants.

The IEA was one of the first authorities last year to publicly accuse Russia of manipulating gas prices in Europe, indicates FT.

In the fall of 2021, the head of European diplomacy, Josep Borrell, accused Russia of not providing additional gas supplies to the EU in excess of contractual obligations, which contributes to rising prices. At the same time, Moscow has repeatedly emphasized that it is fulfilling its obligations under contracts and is not involved in the growth of world gas prices. The EU even conducted an antimonopoly investigation against Gazprom, however, as a result, it concluded that the rise in prices was the result of a number of factors, including & mdash; growing demand for gas in the world.

After the start of the special operation in Ukraine, European countries imposed several packages of sanctions against Russia, including against the banking and energy sectors of the economy. Also, European countries decided to refuse gas supplies via the completed Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which runs from Russia to Germany, and decided to diversify supplies by purchasing liquefied natural gas.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Should we expect a boom in demand for suburban real estate Articles Pro And live in peace: six countries to change tax residency Articles Pro The benefits of regrets and the power of sincere fun: 5 fresh books on self-development Articles Pro I want to make a training plan. What is important to consider Instructions Pro Is it worth adopting the strange healthy lifestyle habits of Silicon Valley Articles Pro Weakening player: what foreign media prophesy to Russian oil and gas because of the sanctions. What awaits the financial market Forecasts

In mid-June, Gazprom announced that it would reduce supplies to Germany via the operating Nord Stream 1 pipeline; due to a delay in the repair of units for the compressor station in Vyborg. This repair was to be carried out by Siemens, which closed its business in Russia, and a broken unit can be repaired only in Canada, which, in turn, banned the maintenance and repair of Russian equipment under sanctions.

Nord Stream-1» decreased from 167 million cubic meters. m per day up to 100 million cubic meters. m per day, and then was reduced by another third— up to 67 million cubic meters per day. This decision was considered politically motivated in Germany.

Due to the reduction in gas supplies, Austria, Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark have introduced the first level of emergency warning for gas. This regime implies close monitoring of the situation so that the governments of countries can quickly make decisions if it worsens. Berlin also decided to increase the load on coal stations in order to fill gas storage facilities by 80% by October.

The Netherlands has decided to remove restrictions on the operation of coal-fired power plants for electricity generation without the use of gas (previously they operated at 35% capacity). Denmark also expects a significant deterioration in the gas supply situation, the government of the country has prepared an action plan for the winter period, which provides for the use of emergency gas supplies and the complete or partial cessation of gas supplies to the country's largest gas consuming companies for a limited period.

The European Commission said that against the background of the refusal of energy carriers from Russia, the European Union will need to increase coal consumption for some time. The EC admits that this is not in line with the “green” agenda, but Brussels has no choice.

According to the consulting company ICIS, Europe managed to reduce its dependence on Russian gas to about 20% of its total supply after the start of the special operation in Ukraine from about 40% before, indicates F.T. However, the possibilities of diversifying supplies are almost exhausted, according to ICIS.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


Lithuanian Customs declared a violation of the ban on imports from Russia by business

The representative of the Lithuanian customs said that companies continue to import goods from Russia =”Lithuanian Customs announced a violation of the ban on imports from Russia by businesses” />

Lithuanian businesses have not completely severed contacts with companies from Russia that fell under sanctions, said Rolandas Jurgaitis, a representative of the Lithuanian customs, Delfi reports.


“It seems that <…> We sympathize with Ukraine, but money is money, business is business, and not all business, I want to say, patriotically ceased its activities. There are those who continue and do not want to stop, & mdash; he said.

According to the representative of the department, some companies still order goods from Russia and Belarus, which are prohibited from being imported into Lithuania. Businessmen submit declarations several times in the hope that one of the employees will miss the goods and they will be able to circumvent the sanctions, Jurgaitis claims.

He noted that most often timber is illegally transported to Lithuania, as well as to other Baltic countries. Customs officers drew up more than 100 protocols in connection with offenses and began to investigate dozens of cases.

On June 15, the head of the Latvian State Revenue Service, Ieva Jaunzeme, reported more than 400 cases of violations of sanctions against Russia and Belarus, Leta wrote (a copy is available in the archive). She explained that companies forge contracts, indicating dates before the imposition of sanctions, which allows the import of goods.

Western countries have imposed sanctions against Russia due to military operations in Ukraine. The European Union adopted six packages of restrictions, including a ban on the import of iron, steel, coal, cement, rubber, timber, seafood, alcohol, luxury goods and other categories of goods.

Read on RBC Pro Pro From magazine to airline: read « Losing Your Virginity by Richard Branson Summary Pro Whether to Adopt Weird Silicon Valley Healthy Habits Pro Articles Be Realistic: Techniques to Cope with Anxiety at Work Pro Articles How to Care for Your Skin After 35: 5 Important Rules How To Close a Deal Under Sanctions and don't bring on trouble Instructions Pro The Fed raises rates, but inflation doesn't fall. How close is a recession? country turnover. The restrictions affected about 20% of Russian exports.

Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone else


Nebenzya denied claims that Russia wants to destroy Ukraine

Vasily Nebenzya

The accusations against Russia that it allegedly wants to destroy Ukraine do not correspond to reality, Ukrainians remain a native and friendly people. Vasily Nebenzya, Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN, announced this the day before.

“Today we heard accusations that we want to destroy Ukraine, burn everything Ukrainian in this country. It's not like that at all. We want to burn out in Ukraine the neo-Nazism and nationalism that has flourished in a stormy color, because of which this country has consistently turned into anti-Russia, becoming a direct threat to us and the inhabitants of Donbass, — said the diplomat.

At the same time, Nebenzya said that Russia still has a good attitude towards the Ukrainian people, culture and language. The permanent representative called the Ukrainians “a native and friendly people to us.”

On February 24, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the start of a special military operation to “demilitarize and denazify” Ukraine. Then the head of state said that the purpose of the operation— assistance to the DNR and LNR and the prevention of “genocide”; of the Russian-speaking population of Donbass.

On February 26, Nebenzya spoke about the imminent solution of the task of “demilitarization and denazification”; Ukraine. “We are not at war with Ukraine and the Ukrainian people, we are conducting a special military operation against nationalists and to protect the inhabitants of Donbass,” — then said the diplomat. In early June, the diplomat said that he allowed the complete liberation of the territories of the DPR and LPR in the near future.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that the purpose of the operation— the end of US dominance along with allies in the world. “Domination, which is built with gross violations of international law. According to certain rules, which they only now repeat and which they work out from case to case, — said Lavrov.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Be realistic: how to deal with anxiety at work Waiting For Clarity: Will Warehouse Rentals Get Cheaper In 2022 Articles Pro I want to make a training plan. What is important to consider Instructions Pro Banks in Russia are urgently changing their software due to sanctions. What awaits the financial market Forecasts Pro “Their furniture was immediately faked there”: how IKEA conquered China Pro cases How to deal with the impostor syndrome in five steps Instructions

Tags Subscribe to RuTube our RuTube channel


Pro-Russian authorities of Zaporozhye called for the elimination of the border with Russia

The border between Russia and the southern regions of Ukraine must be eliminated. This was stated by Vladimir Rogov, a member of the main council of the military-civilian administration (CAA) of the Zaporozhye region, RIA Novosti reports.

Rogov motivated this by the fact that 73–85% of Ukrainians have relatives in Russia. He compared the border between the two countries with the Berlin Wall, when 60 & ndash; 68% of the inhabitants of East Berlin and the GDR had relatives in West Berlin and the FRG.

He recalled that the Germans did not referendum, but simply demolished the Berlin Wall and began to live in a single state. “We are no worse than the Germans,” — Rogov said.

In March, the Russian Ministry of Defense announced that it had taken control of part of the territory of the Zaporozhye region, not including the regional center. These are the cities of Energodar, Vasilievka, Melitopol, Berdyansk and other settlements. Now in the cities of Zaporozhye there is a military commandant's office. The Russian ruble was introduced into circulation in the region, and Russian TV channels began broadcasting in some cities, including Melitopol.

the entry of the region into Russia after the referendum. According to Rogov, the referendum should take place this year. The Kremlin noted that this issue should be decided by the inhabitants of the region themselves.

Zelensky warned that Kyiv would withdraw from the negotiation process with Moscow when holding referendums in the regions of the country occupied by Russian troops.

p> Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


Named the area of ​​​​probable direct collision between Russia and NATO

Photo: AP.

Western media again started talking about a possible clash between NATO and Russia. This time, analysts see the possibility of such a conflict in the confrontation between Moscow and Vilnius after the decision of Lita to ban the transit of goods subject to sanctions to the Kaliningrad region. In Russia, this was regarded as a blockade of Kaliningrad. Some politicians called for resolving this issue with the help of the army.

As the American publication Politico notes in its new material, the Suwalki corridor is a likely zone of direct military clash between the alliance and the Russian army. This is a hypothetical land corridor with a length of about 100 km, which can connect Belarus with the Kaliningrad region of Russia. Currently, Poland's border with Lithuania passes through this territory.

The Lithuanian military says they do not see any dangers yet. However, they call the Suwalki corridor the “Achilles heel of Lithuania”.

As the military explains, if Russia conducts an operation in this corridor, it will be able to simultaneously attack from the east (from Belarus) and from the west (from the Kaliningrad region ). This will enable the Russian military to quickly cut off the Baltic countries from NATO allies in the south.

The publication also notes that Russia has formed a powerful military presence in Kaliningrad: nuclear weapons, the Baltic Fleet and tens of thousands of soldiers. 

Lithuania sees the only way out in building up the NATO contingent in this area. She herself is not ready for confrontation, the publication notes.


Russia and Turkey held talks on the export of Ukrainian grain

Photo: Global Look Press

In Moscow on Tuesday, June 21, negotiations were held between the Russian and Turkish sides through the defense ministries. This was reported in the Russian defense department. It is noted that during the meeting, issues on the export of grain from Ukrainian ports were discussed.

“The parties discussed the safe exit of Turkish merchant ships and the export of grain from Ukrainian ports, as well as approaches to ensuring safe navigation in the Black Sea” , – the message of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation says.

During the discussion of issues, the parties emphasized the importance of interaction between the Russian Federation and Turkey. This format made it possible to ensure the release of their port in Mariupol, as well as the Turkish dry cargo ship Azov Concorde.


IKEA began to curtail the retail network in Russia, terminating lease agreements ahead of schedule

The Swedish side is ready for large fines, but did not close all the stores at once.

IKEA notifies landlords in Russian shopping centers that it intends to terminate contracts with them ahead of schedule. Recall that the leadership of the Swedish furniture concern announced that it was curtailing business in the Russian Federation.

Now, according to “Vedomosti”, the furniture chain will be closed. Almost all leaseholders for the brand received messages about the termination of lease agreements.

At the same time, the agreement is terminated unilaterally, the sources of the publication specify, which means that the Swedish side is ready for large fines.

Only in Moscow, IKEA was represented in ten local shopping centers. On request “Vedomosti” in one of them they said that they really received a letter.

In another, they denied the information, explaining that, most likely, the closing process will take some time, and will not be simultaneous. Or we are talking about some kind of priorities in curtailing the business, which allow us to keep some stores for now.

According to the publication, the Swedish company has 26 stores of various forms in 12 Russian settlements, work in them stopped on March 4 .

The fact that retail is closing was not officially confirmed by IKEA, stating that such a decision “is on pause”.

Let us recall, as Topnews wrote, about his leaving the Russian segment of the business, the Swedish side announced on June 15. It was announced that production would be stopped at four Russian factories and their sale.

Unsold goods were planned to be sold to employees and customers of the company..

Join our VK group to keep abreast of events in Russia and the world


HIV in Russia: fights without rules. A story about a zero conscience in a new way …

The biological security of the country, the outbreak of monkeypox and… HIV infection in the cinema, — all this became the subject of expert discussions during the Second All-Russian Conference “HIV Infection 2020-2030: Challenges, Scenarios, Resources”, which was recently held in the capital. The event was held in the “hybrid” format, it was attended by well-known Russian and foreign scientists, as well as practicing clinicians.

«The mobilization experience in countering the new coronavirus infection was passed with dignity, — said the forum opener Natalia Pakskina, Deputy Director of the Department for Organization of Emergency Medical Care and Health Risk Management of the Ministry of Health of Russia. — Now Russian healthcare is on the verge of solving new problems in the field of virology. Special responsibility and burden falls on the infectious service, in particular, the AIDS service. Today, in the face of unprecedented pressure on Russia — a very precise historical moment when memory must be restored and treated with due attention and respect, resolutely and firmly defending the honor and dignity of not only the profession, but the country as a whole.

The struggle of meanings

This sentiment set the tone for the event. It was about the socio-cultural aspects of HIV infection. So, the participants noticed that recently a whole series — about how HIV appeared in the USSR. Everyone agreed that this “film experiment” — an obvious example of how art becomes a hostage to the political situation. Alas, the main idea of ​​this television production is that the country was not protected from the outbreak of a new disease by science with its names, which gave the world and the country deliverance from many real tragedies, and the powerful “sanitary shield” not created in the USSR; countries. The fate of public health, according to the authors of the series, was in the hands of, in fact, a random person — a young epidemiologist who is ashamed of his father, a great medical director in the Union Ministry of Health.

This is a significant “artistic assumption”; completely ignores the fundamental foundations that our great predecessors laid down for decades and which really protected the country at the moment of an unexpected epidemiological challenge. And not the ambitions and personal roles of individual conflicting “heroes.” The opinion and activity of a junior researcher in this system a priori could not matter.

Successfully the creators of the series calculated the time of the premiere! Added their loud shout to the hoots for the “exception” Russia. And they offer us to look at ourselves through this fake prism — health care failure and eventually — historical weakness.

Anti-epidemic service of the USSR and Russia — traditionally one of the strengths of the national health care system. And besides, by the way, in response to the tragedy in the city of Elista, there was also a powerful public consolidation. In the late 1980s as a reflection of the will of many progressive politicians, journalists and cultural figures to help the country fight a new challenge, the Ogonyok-AntiAIDS Foundation was created, in whose initiatives, together with prominent doctors, people of such a magnitude as Mstislav Rostropovich took part . The Foundation did a lot then to educate the population about the dangers of HIV.

Today, it is the efforts of the professional community that largely determine which vector the “great social reset” will take.

The experts unanimously agreed that in order not to end up near the ruins, it is necessary to organize a decisive, total opposition to the systemic work that multiplies and popularizes an “alternative reality” based on myths. The first of which — millions, even tens of millions of patients, their country is “attributed” since the early 2000s. According to forecasts, in 2020 in Russia there should have been from 5 to 14 million HIV-positive residents. However, there is no real million in 2022.

The more important is professional work with the population and medical students — about the glorious traditions of domestic fundamental science. Indeed, a brilliant scientific virological school has been formed in our country, recognized by specialists all over the world. Outstanding Soviet scientists stood at its origins — virologists, epidemiologists and clinicians. So, academician Viktor Mikhailovich Zhdanov, who proposed to the World Health Organization in 1958 a program to eradicate smallpox, began to study HIV from the moment it was first published in the United States, when not a single patient had yet been seen in the USSR. And even then, he largely laid the foundations for working strategies to combat the epidemic, which are relevant today.

And the first cases of HIV infection and AIDS in the USSR were detected by academician Nikolai Sergeevich Potekaev: foreign students-Africans — in 1984, a citizen of the USSR — in 1986. As part of the “Rakhmanov Readings” in 1988, Academician Potekaev held the All-Union Conference on HIV infection — the first event of this magnitude dedicated to this disease. Under the leadership of academicians Rem Viktorovich Petrov and Rakhim Musaevich Khaitovfundamental approaches to the development of a vaccine were created, the first Soviet test system for detecting HIV infection was put into production.

It was these people who laid the foundation for the entire architecture of the modern organization of the AIDS service, including work on the early detection of HIV -infection and mass examination of the population.

It is impossible not to recall the unique period of Peter Nikolaevich Burgasov, For 20 years, he headed one of the most effective anti-epidemic services in the world, represented not only by powerful scientific and production sites, but also by a network of anti-plague and sanitary-epidemiological stations. And, of course, the results that he provided, unprecedented for his time: it was Academician P. N. Burgasov who in 1980 signed the act on the complete eradication of smallpox on Earth.

New horizons

We also talked about how to build work in the new geopolitical realities. The participants in the discussion agreed that the domestic healthcare in the field of combating infectious diseases, including new challenges, is absolutely competitive today. Joint research with partners from the BRICS countries, which are determined to strengthen strategic cooperation with Russia, is at the stage of dynamic development. A solid foundation has been created for the development of a single influential expert space for combating HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 with Chinese colleagues.

«An eloquent confirmation of international cooperation was the publication of a unique work concerning the results of an unprecedented large-scale comparative study on the vaccination of HIV-infected patients against COVID-19 in one of the journals of the Lancet family (the world's leading scientific publication), prepared by a team of Moscow doctors, researchers from the Institute. N.F. Gamaleya and colleagues from the field of intelligent systems and information technologies, — stresseddeputy head of the Moscow Department of Health Elena Khavkina.

In turn, head of the institute Academician Gamalei Alexander Gintsburgemphasized that, according to the vector outlined by the country's leadership and the Russian government, in the new reality, which requires the intensification of the country's own development, it is scientific centers that should become the basis for this development. They will take an active part in the implementation of large-scale programs of national importance, starting with the priority areas most sensitive to the country's security.

“The formation of a strong, reliable protection against new infections was designated as the most demanded task,” &mdash ; summed up Mr. Gunzburg.

Chief Freelance Specialist on HIV Infection of the Ministry of Health of Russia and the Department of Health of Moscow, Head of the Moscow Center for the Prevention and Control of AIDS Alexey Mazus >spoke about the special potential of Moscow in ensuring infection safety. He noted that it was the capital's approach to combating HIV/AIDS that largely formed the basis of the State Strategy to Combat the Spread of HIV Infection in the country for the period up to 2030. This situation was the result of many years of work on building the “Moscow model”; counteracting HIV/AIDS — with an emphasis on mass screening, broad multicomponent prevention, analysis of the social and behavioral aspects of the disease.

Cunning numbers

The expert pointed to the effectiveness of the system for early detection of HIV, as well as to the expansion of the arsenal of prevention programs aimed at a confidential dialogue with each target group. In addition, he noted that the issue of HIV in the context of infection prevention fits into the broader concept of promoting a healthy and environmentally friendly lifestyle and a value-based approach to it.

At the same time, Aleksey Mazus emphasized that the successful dynamics of the Moscow work for many years has traditionally been accompanied by information “stuffing”; from her opponents — a number of global structures interested in advancing their own agenda.

“One of the main components of an effective system for combating HIV infection — this is a diagnostic. If in the EU statistics are formed against the background of low and extremely low rates of testing for HIV infection (3-5%), then in Moscow about 40% of the city's population is examined annually: this is significantly higher than the average Russian indicator, but is obviously a benchmark for the largest world cities», — said Professor Mazus.

He also noted that he managed to maintain the leading position even in 2020 against the backdrop of quarantine restrictive measures in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, with a decrease in the number of examinations by 20%. Today, Moscow has already returned to the “pre-Covid” indicators, to the level of 2019: HIV testing coverage in the capital in 2021 increased by 1.1 million (up to 5.5 million examinations) and amounted to 43.4% of the population. At the same time, the “calculations” used in some media, which should indicate the supposedly low coverage of ART among HIV-infected residents of Moscow, do not correspond to reality.

According to the data of the Federal State Statistical Observation Form No. 61 for Moscow, antiretroviral therapy coverage in 2021 amounted to 90.5% of the number of patients under dispensary observation, which is also one of the benchmark indicators for global healthcare of the effectiveness of measures to combat HIV/AIDS.

“The figure cited in some sources is below 50%,” to which the collective “analysts” refer, to be precise, obviously obtained by comparing the number of positive results of laboratory tests for HIV infection conducted in the city with the real number of infected people who are here. It is important that of all the positive results received, only a little more than 30% belongs to permanent residents of the capital. Moreover, some of the people from other cities, in whose blood the Moscow laboratories detected HIV, did not even come here, but donated blood in their regions, the rest only came to the capital for a short period for medical help, — the expert noted.

In addition, according to Alexei Mazus, to compare the number of biomaterial samples studied with the number of people actually living in the city, and on this basis, either non-professionals or people inclined to consciously discredit the Russian&nbsp can draw far-reaching conclusions. ;and, in particular, Moscow healthcare.

Epidemiological monitoring data show a steady trend: among Moscow residents, the number of new HIV-infected people is decreasing every year. In 2021, it decreased by another 8%. Among all HIV-infected people identified in Moscow last year, the proportion of Muscovites was only 31%. The majority of identified HIV-positive — nonresident citizens.

Rate the material


Vedomosti learned about plans to accelerate the registration of new drugs in Russia

As deputy Alexander Petrov clarified to the publication, the bill involves a system of tracks that will divide medicines into those where standard registration would be appropriate, and those where a quick launch to the market is possible (during a pandemic)

State Duma deputies plan to prepare a bill in the autumn session that will simplify the registration of new drugs in Russia. This was reported to “Vedomosti” Alexander Petrov, Member of the Health Committee of the Lower House of Parliament.

According to the deputy, this will be achieved by reducing bureaucratic procedures, switching to electronic document management, as well as speeding up the launch of certain drugs on the market.

A track system may appear in the legislative initiative, Petrov continued. It will divide medicines into those where standard registration would be appropriate (such as generics) and those where fast track is dictated by an emergency. An example of a fast track is the practice of bringing vaccines and drugs to the market for the prevention and treatment of coronavirus, the deputy explained.

In addition to epidemics, life-threatening conditions and rare diseases of patients, as well as a shortage of medicines, can become a reason for entering the fast track, Petrov added. The choice of drugs that will be brought to the market with a certain degree of risk, in his opinion, should be dealt with by an interdepartmental commission after assessing the ratio of risk and benefit.

The accelerated procedure can attract foreign developers to the domestic market, who will be more willing to localize production here, Vedomosti told Vedomosti. Nikolay Bespalov, Development Director of the analytical company RNC Pharma.

In turn, the head of the scientific expertise of the pharmaceutical fund “Inbio Ventures” Ilya Yasny pointed out that fast-track registration is already in use in the EU and the US. At the same time, according to him, the Russian Ministry of Health is seriously inferior to Western regulators— European Medicines Agency (EMA) and The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)— in the number of experts. In Russia, 60 specialists are involved in the registration of medicines, in the EMA— 4500 experts, he cited the data.

Read on RBC Pro Pro What seven types of transactions can end in a criminal case Cases Pro The benefits of regrets and the power of sincere fun: 5 fresh books on self-development What awaits the financial market Forecasts Pro Capitalism in Russia failed to build. What model to replace him with Pro Articles Should I Adopt Weird Silicon Valley Healthy Habits Pro Articles Be Realistic: Techniques to Cope with Anxiety at Work Pro Articles “My ex is stalking me”: how to get rid of an obsessive employer Instructions

After the imposition of Western sanctions, some foreign pharmaceutical companies partially suspended their activities in Russia. Thus, investments were suspended by the German Bayer, the American Pfizer and MSD and the Swiss Novartis. At the same time, the American Eli Lilly decided to suspend the supply of non-vital medicines to the country.

The American AbbVie suspended operations with products for aesthetic medicine in Russia, and Bristol Myers Squibb stopped recruiting participants in clinical trials and launching sites for them in Russia , Belarus and Ukraine.

In early June, Minister of Health Mikhail Murashko said that there was no shortage of medicines in Russia. In addition, as the minister said, in 2021, more than 22 thousand medical products and devices were delivered, of which almost a third domestic production. According to him, the domestic industry is actively involved in the direction of medical equipment.

In turn, Deputy Prime Minister Tatyana Golikova previously instructed the Ministry of Health to start searching for drugs that are not produced in Russia and friendly foreign countries, in case of a shortage of foreign analogues .

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


Global arms industry getting shake-up by war in Ukraine — and China and US look like winners from Russia’s stumbles

class=”MuiTypography-root-126 MuiTypography-h1-131″>Global arms industry getting shake-up by war in Ukraine — and China and US look like winners from Russia’s stumbles

Weapons manufacturers in China are likely to benefit most from Russia’s losses, while US companies will also see a boom.

The ConversationJune 17, 2022 · 3:15 PM EDT

Russia is losing tanks at an astonishing rate. 

Emilio Morenatti/AP

Russia’s war in Ukraine is upending the global arms industry.

As the US and its allies pour significant sums of money into arming Ukraine and Russia bleeds tanks and personnel, countries across the world are rethinking defense budgets, materiel needs and military relationships. Countries that historically have had low levels of defense spending such as Japan and Germany are bulking up, while nations that purchase most of their weapons from Russia are questioning their reliability and future delivery.

My research in this area suggests that, however this war eventually ends, the repercussions for the global defense industry, and for the countries whose companies dominate this sector, will be enormous. Here are four takeaways.

1. Russia will be the biggest loser

Russia’s general sales pitch for its weapons has been they’re “cheaper and easier to maintain than Western alternatives.” This is why Russia accounted for 19% of the world’s arms exports from 2017 to 2021, second only to the US, which had 39% of the market.

However, this pitch may no longer be effective for many countries that have seen Russian equipment losses and failures in Ukraine.

To date, the US estimates Russia has lost almost a thousand tanks, at least 50 helicopters, 36 fighter-bombers and 350 artillery pieces, according to Business Insider. Thousands of Russian soldiers have been killed, with estimates ranging from about 15,000 to as high as 30,000, and Russia is still unable to control Ukraine’s airspace.

The situation has become so dire that there are reports that commanders are trying to preserve equipment by forbidding troops from using them to evacuate wounded soldiers or to support units that have advanced too far.

Russia’s offensive weapons have also proved disappointing. Its missile failure rate — the share that either failed to launch, malfunctioned mid-flight or missed their target — may be as high as 50% to 60% due to design flaws and outdated or inferior equipment.

These problems, along with the Russian military’s slow progress achieving any of President Vladimir Putin’s stated objectives, have raised serious doubts among the country’s traditional customers for weapons exports. Russia sells almost 90% of its weapons to just 10 countries, including India, Egypt and China.

What’s more, Russia’s ability to replace these equipment losses has been hampered by economic sanctions, which bars key foreign components like circuit boards. And Russia will almost certainly need to replace its own military hardware before it exports anything abroad.

That means that even countries that want to keep buying Russian tanks and fighter jets will have to wait in line or turn elsewhere to fulfill their defense needs.

2. Russia’s loss is China’s gain

The country that will likely see the greatest gains from Russia’s displacement as a major arms supplier is China.

In recent years, the country has taken a 4.6% share of the global arms trade, putting it in fourth place behind France’s 11%. At the same time, seven of the top 20 global defense companies in terms of revenues earned from defense sales are Chinese, signaling the sector’s big ambitions.

Currently, the Chinese government buys most of its weapons and vehicles from these domestic arms makers, but China has the capacity to export more military products abroad.

For example, China is already the world’s largest shipbuilder, so exporting more naval ships is a natural next step. The country is expanding its niche role in drone technology and attempting to leverage modernizing its air force with domestically built aircraft to increase exports.

At the moment, only three of the world’s 40 biggest arms importers — Pakistan, Bangladesh and Myanmar — buy a majority of their weapons from China. That could change if China takes advantage of Russian weakness to position itself as a reliable national security, economic and political partner — a core feature of its Belt and Road Initiative.

China is not capable of supplanting US and European weapons, which are considered “top shelf” because of their high quality and price. But China may well fill the market niche that Russian arms makers dominated, thereby increasing Beijing’s role as a major weapons exporter — and gaining the political and economic benefits that accompany that.

One of China’s biggest challenges will involve proving that its weapons work well in live combat situations.

The U.S. has given Ukraine a third of its Javelin anti-tank missiles. 


Ukrainian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP

3. American arms makers will also be big winners

US weapons manufactures dominate the global arms industry. The Ukraine war will likely ensure this stays that way for some time.

The world’s five largest arms companies are all American: Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing, Northrop Grumman and General Dynamics. In fact, half of the top 100 producers of arms are based in the US. Twenty are European. Only two are Russian — despite the country being the world’s second-largest source of arms.

The massive amounts of weapons being transferred from the U.S. to Ukraine will keep American arms makers busy for some time to come. For example, the U.S. has transferred about one-third of its stock of Javelin anti-tank missiles to Ukraine, and it will take three to four years for the Raytheon-Lockheed Martin joint venture to replace them. The $40 billion aid package recently signed by President Joe Biden includes $8.7 billion to replenish US weapons stocks.

The companies’ soaring stock prices are a sign investors believe profitable days are ahead. Lockheed Martin’s stock price is up over 12% since the invasion began — with most of the gains occurring in its immediate aftermath. Northrop Grumman has jumped 20%. At the same time, the broader stock market as measured by the S&P 500 has slumped about 4%.

4. More countries will become arms makers

The flipside to this is that some countries that relied on others for their defense needs may seek to become more self-sufficient.

India, which relied on Russia for almost half of its weapons imports in recent years, is realizing that Russia will need most or all of its production capacity to replace tanks, missiles, aircraft and other weapons used or lost in Ukraine, with less leftover for export.

That means India will need to either source spare parts for vehicles and weapons from other former Russia arms customers such as Bulgaria, Georgia and Poland, or build up its own defense industry. In April, India announced it would ramp up production of helicopters, tank engines, missiles and early airborne warning systems to offset any potential reduction in Russian exports.

Concerns about Russian reliability are also growing. In May, India canceled a $520 million helicopter deal with Russia. While there are reports U.S. pressure played a role, it also seems to be part of the government’s strategy over the past few years to build its own domestic defense industrial base.

Brazil, Turkey and other emerging market countries have also been developing their own defense industries over the past two decades to reduce their reliance on arms imports. The Ukraine war will accelerate this process.

Putin likely didn’t expect to shake up the global arms market with his effort to annex Ukraine — or cause the decline of his country’s weapons sector. But that’s just one more way his war is causing a geopolitical earthquake.

Terrence Guay is a clinical professor of international business and director for the Center for Global Business Studies at Penn State. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization dedicated to unlocking the knowledge of experts for the public good. 

Over 307,000 children have been evacuated to Russia from Ukraine and Donbas since the end of February

Mikhail Mizintsev, head of the National Defense Control Center of the Russian Federation. Screenshot of the video.

A representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense announced the evacuation of more than 1.9 million people, including over 307 thousand children, to Russia from the regions of Ukraine, the Donetsk and Luhansk people's republics since the end of February.

Despite all difficulties created by the Kyiv authorities, over the past day, without the participation of the Ukrainian side, 29,733 people, including 3,502 children, were evacuated from dangerous regions of Ukraine and the Donbass republics to the territory of the Russian Federation. And in total, since the beginning of the special military operation, there have been 1,936,911 people, of which 307,423 are children,” Mikhail Mizintsev, head of the National Defense Control Center of the Russian Federation, said at a Saturday briefing.

According to him, the Russian database contains more than 2.7 million requests from those wishing to move to Russia from more than 2,000 settlements in Ukraine and the regions of the DPR and LPR controlled by it.


Scholz called Germany’s mistake in relations with Russia

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz supported the policy of Angela Merkel in relations with Russia The current chancellor refused to condemn the policy of his predecessor Angela Merkel, noting that an attempt to negotiate peacefully could not be a mistake. Scholz considered it a mistake that Germany became dependent on Russian energy resources =”Scholz called Germany's mistake in relations with Russia” />

Angela Merkel and Olaf Scholz

Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel's policy towards Russia was not wrong, an attempt at peaceful coexistence cannot be, but Berlin's energy dependence from Moscow is a mistake, acting Prime Minister Olaf Scholz told DPA.

“An attempt at reconciliation can never be wrong, as well as an attempt to negotiate peacefully with each other. So I see myself closely next to my predecessor,»,— he said (quote from Welt).

According to him, a mistake has been made in the energy policy of Germany in recent years— Germany has become overly dependent on Russian energy resources, without creating the necessary infrastructure “so that in case of emergency it could quickly turn the situation around.” At the same time, Scholz refused to condemn Merkel's policy, saying: “I have always worked well with the former German chancellor and see no reason to question this in retrospect.”

Scholz also defends Merkel's decision to oppose Ukraine's NATO membership in 2008. Then she explained her position by the fact that only those countries in which the bloc is supported not only by politicians, but also by a significant percentage of the population should join the alliance. Later, Merkel said that Ukraine and Georgia, whose accelerated membership was decided at the summit, could become NATO members, but the time has not come yet.

“NATO membership criteria must be met by any state that wants to join an alliance. Ukraine's accession to NATO did not take place,” Scholz noted, stressing that President Vladimir Putin nevertheless justified the start of the military operation.

The dependence on Russian gas supplies and the country's ability to use this as leverage was warned in the United States as early as the 1980s. In 1981, the Reagan administration, in response to the introduction of martial law in Poland, tried to stop the construction of the main export gas pipeline Urengoy— Pomary— Uzhgorod, which was attended by European companies and banks. Washington imposed a ban on the supply of high-tech equipment from the United States to the USSR, and in 1982 tightened the embargo, banning the supply of products to foreign affiliates of American companies.

The European partners of the US refused to support these sanctions and declared them illegal. As a result of negotiations with representatives of European governments, on November 13, 1982, US President Ronald Reagan announced the lifting of the embargo on the supply of oil and gas equipment to the USSR.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Parallel imports: what goods can be imported from Turkey to bypass sanctions 4 More Types of Candidates HR Doesn't Like Super Mario Investment Principles p> The German authorities, after the start of the Russian military operation in Ukraine and the imposition of sanctions against Russia, including the supply of coal, oil, and so far only the ban on Russian gas under discussion, said that it was hard for the country to abandon energy resources from Russia. So, on June 13, Scholz, speaking at the EU summit in Brussels, said that the German government is doing everything possible to reduce dependence on Russian oil and gas as soon as possible, but there are “serious practical problems” with this.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


The United States did not rule out that sanctions against Russia could become excessive

According to Washington, despite “thousands of sanctions”, Moscow is likely to receive more profit due to rising fuel prices

The United States is concerned that anti-Russian sanctions imposed against the backdrop of a special operation in Ukraine may become redundant, Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo said during a congressional hearing broadcast by C-SPAN.

“In the United States alone, we have imposed a thousand sanctions against Russian structures and individuals,” — he added.

In addition, according to Adeyemo, since the beginning of the military operation in Ukraine, Moscow has probably increased its oil revenues. “We know that Russia is currently selling less oil per barrel than it did before the invasion [of Ukraine], but because of rising prices, it may be making more profit,” pointed out by the Deputy Minister.

He noted that the United States is discussing with allies and partners the prospects for introducing a ceiling on purchase prices for oil from Russia, and also exchanging data on the assets of Russian businessmen around the world.

The US imposed an oil and gas embargo on March 8. In announcing this, US President Joe Biden acknowledged that such a decision would lead to an increase in gasoline prices in the United States, but at the same time stated the need to “apply pressure” on Russian President Vladimir Putin because of the military operation in Ukraine. Later, the EU joined the sanctions against Russian oil. The ban includes the supply of raw materials by sea, and countries dependent on Russian oil imports will continue to receive it through the Druzhba pipeline.

Read on RBC Pro Pro The tax authorities believe that the cost of the manager is too high. How to be Pro instructions Is it worth it to adopt the strange healthy lifestyle habits of Silicon Valley Articles Pro CRM marketing: four main metrics for evaluating the result Pro instructions What financial protection measures to use in the contract Pro instructions How not to fail an interview: the most common behavioral questions bring Russia to the top of the cloudiest countries Forecasts Pro Russia is waiting for galloping inflation. Why it's dangerous for businessUS Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said earlier that Washington is interested in Russian oil entering the world market, as this will help keep prices down and avoid a recession. On May 20, Yellen announced that the G7 countries discussed the creation of a cartel of buyers of Russian oil to control the increase in fuel prices. It is assumed that within its framework a price ceiling will be set that will allow the West to reduce the Russian budget revenues from the sale of oil without causing “too much burden on the world economy.”

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov ruled out budget losses in this year due to restrictions on Russian oil supplies by sea. According to him, oil markets do not obey political “orders”, and Moscow has alternatives to the European market, where it is increasing supplies. In the Kremlin, speaking of the embargo by the EU, they warned that such a decision would “hit everyone.” According to Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak, in the event of a ban, world oil prices could jump to $300 per barrel.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


Deputy Fedorov told how Russia can exclude the Baltic countries from NATO


State Duma deputy Yevgeny Fedorov said in an interview with Sputnik Latvia that if Russia decides to withdraw recognition of Latvia's independence, Lithuania and Estonia, then NATO is likely to expel these countries from the North Atlantic alliance.

According to him, Russia's decision to withdraw recognition of independence will create conditions that will force NATO to return to the 1997 borders.

“According to the sixth paragraph of the NATO Charter, disputed territories cannot enter the alliance. Therefore, as soon as the territories of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia are recognized as disputed, this will become the basis for their exclusion from NATO,” Fedorov added.

Earlier, Fedorov said that in the future Russia may withdraw recognition of the independence of Ukraine, Latvia and Estonia. He submitted a draft law to the State Duma, which states that the decision “On Recognizing the Independence of the Republic of Lithuania” is illegal. It was adopted in violation of the requirements of several articles of the Constitution of the USSR and by an unconstitutional body.


American economist called the monstrous mistake of the United States in relation to Putin and Russia

The expert explained which economy should be compared with the Russian one.

Political analyst James Dore said on a YouTube show that the US government made the mistake of thinking Russian President Vladimir Putin's words about Russia's economic power – this is a bluff.

According to him, eight years ago, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham from South Carolina said that economically Russia was comparable to Italy, and it is not clear how the president manages to win poker with such weak cards.

The expert bluntly stated that at the moment the ruble is becoming “the most reliable currency in the world”, – the expert repeated these words twice, focusing the attention of the channel's subscribers on this.

He believes that in the economic confrontation with the West, Russia wins, because its opponents had to face the opposite effect of the imposed sanctions – rising fuel and food prices around the world.

“It is extremely rare for the West to make such monstrous mistakes in evaluating economies”, — RIA Novosti quotes Dora.

A more correct comparison, which the United States did not make, would be if they compare the economy of the Russian Federation with Japan or Germany. Therefore, an attempt to abruptly break off cooperation with this country led to the restructuring of the entire world market.

Recall, as Topnews wrote, the sanctions turned into problems for Europe and the United States, where fuel prices rose to a record high.

In Moscow, the introduced economic measures are called a previously unprecedented war. According to Vladimir Putin, the goal of the West – deteriorating living conditions of millions of people.

Join our VK group to keep abreast of events in Russia and the world


Prime Minister of Latvia promised not to resume gas supplies from Russia

Riga previously imported 90% of the required volume of gas from Russia, but the decision not to continue purchases will not be reconsidered, Karins said. He also called for changing NATO's defense strategy and increasing arms supplies to Kyiv

Latvia does not intend to resume gas imports from Russia, despite the difficulties after the refusal of supplies; a way should be found to impose sanctions on Russian gas, the head said Latvian government Krisjanis Karins in an interview with El País.

“About 90% of what Latvia imported last year was Russian, but we are no longer going to buy [Russian-made gas],” — emphasized the Prime Minister of Latvia (quote from TASS).

Kariņš expressed confidence that due to the decision of most European countries to continue buying gas from Russia, Moscow is able to finance a special operation in Ukraine and support the ruble. He also explained that a special plan “in case of unforeseen circumstances” made it possible to refuse to continue buying gas from Russia. with the energy supply of the country.

Karins also called for a change in NATO's defense strategy towards Poland and the Baltics. According to him, she admits the loss of part of the territory in the event of an attack and its subsequent return. “It becomes clear that the option of ceding the territory even for a short period of time cannot be considered,” — emphasized the Latvian Prime Minister. He added that the alliance should create a “progressive defense strategy” that would involve the constant presence of a large number of military personnel on the eastern flank.

“Peace can only be achieved through victory,”— he assessed the situation in Ukraine, calling for more weapons to be supplied to Ukraine.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Russia is waiting for galloping inflation. Why it is dangerous for business Why import substitution can take Russia to the top of the cloudiest countries Forecasts Pro How to work less and increase productivity: 4 tips Articles Pro And live in peace: six countries to change tax residence >Latvia stopped receiving Russian gas at the beginning of April, this was due to the decision not to obey Moscow's demands to use a new format for paying for deliveries with the opening of a ruble account with Gazprombank. This scheme applied to countries that the Russian government had previously identified as unfriendly, the list includes all EU countries, Ukraine, Micronesia, Singapore and others.

Now gas is supplied to Latvia through the Klaipeda liquefied natural gas terminal and the Incukalns underground gas storage, and in the latter “atypically a lot of gas for this period”, said in early April the head of the operator of the Latvian gas transmission system Conexus Baltic Grid (Conexus) Uldis Bariss. He assured that this allows not to worry about Latvia's energy security in the next few months.

In early July, the Latvian gas company Latvijas Gaze warned of raising tariffs for households in the country for the use of natural gas, prices will increase from July 1 in the range from 65.6 to 89.9%.

Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram


Macron says Zelensky will have to negotiate with Russia

The President stressed that France does not want a conflict with Russia and seeks a peaceful settlement. Western countries will also be able to continue dialogue with Moscow after the end of hostilities in Ukraine, Macron believes />

Vladimir Zelensky soldiers at a NATO military base in Romania, BFM reports.

“At some point, the President of Ukraine will have to negotiate with Russia,”— Macron said.

He stressed that France “is not at war with Russia”, writes TFI, and the only desired outcome of the conflict for her— Ukrainian victory or cessation of hostilities.

From the very beginning of the military operation, President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky has declared his readiness for negotiations with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin. The Kremlin has repeatedly stressed that such a meeting can take place only after the delegations of the two countries draw up a draft peace agreement.

Since February 24, the parties have held several rounds of negotiations and sent each other proposals for a settlement, but in mid-May they announced the suspension of the dialogue. The head of the Russian delegation, Vladimir Medinsky, specified that the discussion was frozen at the initiative of Kyiv. The Ukrainian authorities explained the changes during the negotiations by the events in Bucha (the Ministry of Defense denied the involvement of the Russian military in the killing of civilians in the city).

Read on RBC Pro Pro Why import substitution can take Russia to the top of the cloudiest countries Forecasts Pro The new iron curtain is digital: why IT companies are leaving Russia : 4 reasons Articles Pro I want to make a training plan. Things to Consider Pro Instructions Being a vegan is good for you. Is it True Articles Pro The US market has reached a fair valuation. This is evidenced by “Rule 20” Articles Pro How the conflict in Ukraine made investors forget about ESG and ecology actions. The Ukrainian leader called the cessation of hostilities the only topic for possible discussion with Putin.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in early June that the West had forbidden Kyiv to continue negotiations with Moscow.

Authors Tags Persons

Emmanuel Macron

Politician, President of France

December 21, 1977

Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


In the Czech Republic, Macron’s words about the “humiliation” of Russia were considered a misunderstanding of the problem

Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavsky said that French President Emmanuel Macron did not understand the essence of the problem when he said that Western leaders should not “humiliate Russia.” According to him, Moscow does not care how the West perceives it

French President Emmanuel Macron did not understand the essence of the problem when he said that Russia should not be “humiliated”, Moscow does not care how it is perceived in the West, Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavsky said on CNN Prima News.

«Russia— the aggressor, and we should not take into account whether she is humiliated or not. Macron is probably not very versed in this issue, [President Vladimir] Putin does not care how Russia is perceived in the West, — said Lipavski (quote from České noviny).

In early June, Macron, speaking about his constant contact with the Russian president, stressed that Western leaders should not “humiliate Russia” so that after the cessation of hostilities, a way out of the crisis could be found through diplomatic channels. According to Macron, he is confident that the Russian authorities have made a “historical and fundamental mistake for their people, for themselves and for history,” which he told Putin.

Macron and Putin have been in frequent contact since the end of last year, when the situation around Ukraine began to escalate, and Russia— demand security guarantees from the US and NATO. In early February, they met in person in Moscow. As of the end of May, Macron has become Putin's most frequent interlocutor of all world leaders. The French president also actively maintains contacts with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky.

The frequent communication of the French president with Putin was criticized by other European leaders. So, in early April, Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki said that their conversations did not help prevent a military operation in Ukraine, and the situation requires “clear and decisive” action. sanctions. Macron then called the dialogue with Putin his duty, stressing that from the very beginning of his presidential term in 2017, “he did not pander to him, unlike others.” According to Estonian Prime Minister Kai Kallas, due to communication with other leaders, Putin does not receive the message that he is “isolated” that they are trying to convey to him.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


Murashko said that all medical projects in Russia will be completed according to plan

Head of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation Mikhail Murashko spoke about the implementation of projects aimed at improving the quality and accessibility of medical care in the country.

He stressed that all these projects will be completed according to plan.

“Today we are implementing large-scale projects that are designed to make medical care even better and more affordable for every Russian,” – RIA Novosti quotes the words of the minister.

Murashko is sure that the implementation of projects will be another step towards the well-being of all citizens of the country.

Earlier it became known that the Russian government allocated more than 1.1 billion rubles for the modernization of primary health care in rural areas, urban-type settlements and small towns.

Rate the material


Astronaut from Russia will be delayed on the ISS due to the flight of the representative of Belarus

One of the crew members of the Soyuz MS-23 spacecraft will have to stay on the ISS in order to organize a short-term flight into orbit of a cosmonaut from Belarus, TASS reports.

Dmitry Rogozin, Director General of Roscosmos, said this during a conversation with the agency correspondents.

“Yes, someone will have to stay longer,” the head of the state corporation said.

According to him, the cosmonaut who will have to stay in orbit has not yet been selected. The official proposal will appear after Roscosmos receives the list of Belarusian candidates.

Let us remind you that the Soyuz MS-23 the preparation stage includes cosmonauts Oleg Kononenko, Andrei Fedyaev and Nikolai Chub. The Belarusian cosmonaut, in turn, will make a short flight next autumn and return to Earth on the Soyuz MS-23.

Earlier, Roscosmos also confirmed the candidacy of cosmonaut Anna Kikina for cross-flights with NASA.

Rate the material


Secretary General of the Arab League announced the demand of the West to condemn Russia because of Ukraine

According to Ahmed Abu al-Gheit, the West is putting pressure on the Arab states. He also suggested that hostilities in Ukraine could continue for years

Ahmed Abu al-Gheit

The West puts pressure on the Arab countries and requires them to condemn Russia's actions in Ukraine, said in an interview with Sada TV channel el-Balad Secretary General of the Arab League (LAS) Ahmed Abu al-Gheit.

He added that the Arab countries have a common position on the Russian-Ukrainian crisis. “I hope that the Arab countries will be able to maintain their security and that the Russian-Ukrainian conflict will not affect the stability in the region”, — al-Gheith noted.

In his opinion, military operations in Ukraine could drag on “for years”; and will have serious consequences.

In April, Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shukri said that the countries of the League of Arab States intend to facilitate negotiations between Russia and Ukraine and are ready to mediate in this process.

The Arab League expressed concern over the worsening humanitarian situation in Ukraine, as well as the negative impact of hostilities on the country's economy. They called on the parties to the conflict to follow the path of diplomatic settlement and dialogue.

The League of Arab States includes 22 states, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Tunisia, Morocco, Bahrain. The headquarters of the organization is located in Cairo, the current Secretary General al-Geyt— former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Egypt.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Serendipity: how to make a coincidence non-random Instructions Pro Three useful exercises to help overcome shyness Instructions Pro What financial protection measures to use in a contract Instructions Pro Why do we lose psychological stability and how Find It Again Instructions Pro Meditation changes the brain. Is it so Research Pro x The Economist Why the tightening of the policy of the European Central Bank threatens the Italian economy Why it is dangerous for business Articles

In mid-May, Egypt estimated the loss of its annual budget due to the conflict in Ukraine at 130 billion Egyptian pounds (about $7 billion at the exchange rate at that time). According to Prime Minister Mustafa Madbouli, the authorities used this amount to mitigate the consequences of high prices.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


Clinton said the talks between Ukraine and Russia were premature

She explained that she agrees with Ukraine in its demand for Russia to withdraw troops to positions before February 24, noting that for the time being “one should not rush into negotiations”

Hillary Clinton

The time has not yet come for talks between Russia and Ukraine, former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in an interview with France Culture, Le Point reports. She believes that the ultimate success in the current situation must be “defeat”; Russia. Clinton agreed with the position of Kyiv, which has repeatedly demanded the withdrawal of Russian troops from Ukrainian territories to the positions they occupied until February 24. “I support the Ukrainians, which means that we can’t rush into negotiations for the time being,” — stressed the ex-Secretary of State.

She also commented on French President Emmanuel Macron, who said in early June that Western leaders should not “humiliate Russia” so that after the end of hostilities there would be a chance to resolve the situation through diplomacy. Clinton called Macron's position “obsolete” and stated that, in her opinion, “Putin has long crossed the red line.”

She also suggested listening more to the leaders of the Baltic countries and Poland, who are “at the forefront” ; and have, in her words, “a much clearer idea of ​​who Putin really is and what his goals are.”

In an interview with NBC in early April, Clinton called for a redoubling of sanctions pressure on Russia to force it to end military operations in Ukraine. In her opinion, they are a threat not only to Ukraine, but also to Europe and democracy.

The leaders of the EU countries, unlike the former US Secretary of State, advocate the resumption of the negotiation process between Kyiv and Moscow, which stalled in April. Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz spoke about this, in particular, at the end of May. At the same time, they emphasized the need for the withdrawal of Russian troops. Scholz also noted that the negotiations should become more concrete.

President Vladimir Putin confirmed his readiness to resume dialogue with Ukraine. Moscow blames Kyiv for the interruption and believes that the Ukrainian authorities abandoned the previously reached agreements, thus leading the situation to a dead end.

Read on RBC Pro Pro The US market has reached a fair assessment. This is evidenced by “Rule 20” Articles Pro How value stocks save investors when the market falls Articles Pro Why import substitution can bring Russia to the top of the cloudiest countries Forecasts Pro Parallel imports: what goods can be imported from Turkey to bypass sanctions Articles Pro The dark side of the leader. What is good, bad and how to get along with it broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


Borrell spoke about coexistence with Russia after the end of the Ukrainian conflict

After the end of hostilities in Ukraine, the European Union will need to learn how to coexist with Russia. To do this, Europe must determine a clear plan of contacts, said the head of EU diplomacy, Josep Borrell, in an interview for the official EU magazine.

In particular, Josep Borrell explained that the goal of the Europeans is to help Ukraine regain the territories that it has lost from the beginning military operations. To him, this goal seems reasonable. He also noted that after the end of the conflict, coexistence with Russia for the EU will be very difficult.

“But we still have to try to coexist with the Russians on this continent,” he explained.

At the same time, the head of European diplomacy specified that the channels of communication with Moscow were never closed.

“Of course, these channels were never closed. The Austrian chancellor was recently in Moscow, the president of the African Union is returning from Sochi, and two emissaries Secretary General of the United Nations are in Russia today, trying to find a solution to the problem of grain exports from Ukraine. We must continue to talk with Russia,” he added.

Regarding the effectiveness of anti-Russian sanctions, Borrell explained that it is too early to draw conclusions , however, they already have a certain negative impact on the economy of the Russian Federation.

“One has only to look, for example, at the decline in Russian car production and its factories closing one after another. Russian civil aviation is also experiencing great difficulty in launching their aircraft due to lack of spare parts. Of course, the ruble exchange rate is at the highest level, but it is not convertible,” he clarified.


Japan saw a threat in military cooperation between China and Russia in Asia

Military cooperation and joint exercises between China and Russia have exacerbated security concerns in East Asia, Japanese Defense Minister Nobuo Kishi said, Reuters reported.

“Japan is surrounded by countries that possess or develop nuclear weapons , and openly ignore the rules of the world. The joint military actions of these two strong military powers will undoubtedly raise the concern of neighboring countries, — he said.

According to him, if the trend continues, “East Asia could become Ukraine tomorrow.”

Russia and China have been conducting active military-technical cooperation for many years, and also regularly conduct joint exercises. So, in August, the north-west of the PRC hosted joint military exercises of Russia and China “West/Interaction”; 2021″, 10 thousand military personnel of both countries took part in them. In May, Russian Tu-95MS and Chinese bombers conducted joint air patrols over the waters of the Sea of ​​Japan and the East China Sea.

In early June, The Washington Post, citing Chinese and American officials, reported that Chinese President Xi Jinping instructed his closest advisers to figure out how to provide financial assistance to Russia without violating Western sanctions. At the same time, the United States has repeatedly threatened to impose restrictions on China in the event of military or economic support for Russia. Beijing called the measures against Moscow unacceptable and stated that it does not circumvent sanctions, but maintains trade relations with Russia.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Glasses, lenses, surgery: which vision correction method to choose Articles Pro The smell of reality: how startups are trying to “flavor” the metaverse Compromises: Five Rules for the Success of Companies Instructions Pro “Everyone thought he was fumbling.” How a “genius investor” from a chat ruined a hundred friends Articles Pro Digitalization for aksakals: how Russians earn money in Uzbekistan Why it is dangerous for business Articles

The largest geopolitical crisis in relations between Russia and the West will inevitably affect regional processes in Eurasia, according to experts from the Russian International Affairs Council, the Institute of the Far East of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Fudan University. In their opinion, Russia will intensify the confrontation with the collective West, while China and other players will want to increase their presence in the Eurasian region.



“Don’t tease the bear”: American analysts talk about the destruction of Russia

“Western “resolvers” rush about and don't know what to do themselves”

The events in Ukraine once again cast American analysts into doubt: what to do with Russia? Somehow her actions do not fit into the previous theories and forecasts. No matter how hard they tried, the Russian economy was not destroyed, the army was advancing, isolation from the world did not work out. And the best minds of the United States are now thinking: to destroy Russia or, after all, leave it alone? President of the All-Russian Police Association, Lieutenant General, Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Lawyer of Russia Yuri Zhdanov spoke about the logic of reasoning and doubts of the American elite.


– The RAND Corporation website recently published an article by one of the project directors of the corporation, Raphael S. Cohen, “The return of the concept of “Do not tease the bear””.

Let me remind you that the RAND Corporation, or, as it is also commonly called, the “thought factory”, is an American strategic research center. The name stands for “research and development”. As a non-profit organization, but funded by US government agencies, the center develops and identifies new methods of analyzing strategic problems and strategic concepts for scientific, educational and philanthropic activities in the interests of public welfare and US national security. True, at first it was a partnership with the US Air Force and some firms to create aircraft, missiles and satellites. And then this corporation found itself in other areas.

This center generates ideas for the leadership of the country. The developed ideas, as a rule, become the basis for decisions. And, it must be admitted that until now these ideas have usually been very balanced and reasoned in order to prevent the “cowboys” from doing trouble. They really made objective analyzes of the strategic situation and gave quite reasonable advice. Which, perhaps, kept the American “hawks” from unnecessarily harsh urges to grab the Colt. Until recently, they succeeded.

It looks like there's some kind of glitch in their brains. So, one of the directors of the corporation Cohen writes: “Do not tease the bear. This idiom summed up the American strategy, which, in essence, argued that the West should avoid confronting Russia so as not to anger the beast. According to him, after the start of the conflict in Ukraine, this approach fell out of favor. But later the concept unexpectedly revived: “A chorus of former officials, scientists and journalists suddenly begin to argue that it would be wiser for Ukraine to resolve the issue, while quite recently many in the same camp called for the exact opposite.”

– The problem is that the Western “solvers” are rushing around and don’t know what to do themselves. Here is an illustrative example of such throwing. The New York Times wrote in March that U.S. policy must be ready to join the fight for Ukraine, “no matter how long it takes until Ukraine is free.” Two months later, the same editorial now argues that the West should seek peace through negotiations, even if it “may require Ukraine to make some difficult decisions” because the risk of a clear victory is too great. And Cohen comments on this: “Don't tease the bear” is suddenly back, and the strategic approach remains as unwise as ever.

– So I say that the West is going crazy. It's okay that Kissinger's statement caused indignation and hatred of the entire so-called “elite” of Ukraine. Kissinger was listed by them in the lists of the “Peacemaker”, which is tantamount to recognizing Ukraine as an “enemy of the people”. Actually, this is true – he definitely never was a friend of the Ukrainian people. As well as Russian. And his concern is exceptionally pragmatic, lest the bear take America down.

As the Abbé d'Herblat said, he is also Aramis, admiring the play of light on the edge of the blade: remember that it separates that light from this one.

– Very vague, ambiguous. A vocal opponent of the “Don't tease the bear” concept, he writes that given the fact that Russian troops are slowly advancing in the Donbas, Russia may have time to regroup, rearm and resume the offensive on more favorable terms.

Cohen concludes that calls for Ukraine to back off further highlight doubts about the West's resilience and its willingness to see difficult tasks through. He sees this as a key element missing from American deterrence today.

At the same time, Cohen cites the arguments of the supporters of the “don't tease the bear” concept. They, in his opinion, believe that “the benefit of retreat and peace talks with Russia will help avoid Russian escalation.”

– Specifically, nothing. The best way to stay consistent is to change with circumstances, Winston Churchill argued. Cohen also argues in accordance with this recommendation. He sagely suggests looking into the situation more carefully.

Cohen opposes former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger's position that “the West cannot 'lose sight' of Russia's long-term relationship and its potential as a future counterbalance to China.”

“In an ideal world, – writes Cohen, Kissinger could be right. Alas, this is not the modern world. According to him, even before the Ukrainian conflict, the West's relations with Russia were overshadowed by a variety of problems – from accusations of interference in elections to cyber attacks. After the conflict in Ukraine, relations “will undoubtedly get worse, no matter what concessions, if any, Ukraine ultimately makes,” he notes.

At the same time, Cohen writes that others in the don't tease the bear group argue that Ukraine should stop now because it has already won. And Georgetown University professor Charles Kupchan, on the other hand, argues that Ukraine has “failed more than enough to justify the cost of further adventurism” and therefore “pushing Russia further is unnecessary and unnecessarily risky.”

– That's what I'm talking about. And then Cohen, who is considered a reasonable person in the political science world, draws a conclusion that is more suitable for a person with deep mental anomalies. Just listen: “When a bear has gone into the wilderness or into hibernation, there is a strong argument in favor of leaving it alone. It's just not Russia today… Dealing with an already enraged, rampaging bear requires a different strategic approach to ensure that Ukraine gets what it needs to shoot the bear.”

– Hardly they will decide to supply Ukraine with nuclear weapons. But let's not take Cohen and his team as fools. With their alleged hesitation, which they expose to the public, they pursue far-reaching strategic goals. They are sure that the most peaceful state will be recognized as the one that will take over the whole world. And the “Russian bear”, especially the enraged one, is the biggest obstacle for these “peacekeepers”. Here they are looking for and training the future “bear hunter”. Who it will be, except for Ukraine, time will tell.


Conscious help. Head of the Life Line Foundation on charity in Russia

Life Line Foundation conducted more than 60 large co-branding campaigns within the framework of a socially oriented business, thanks to which thousands of children were cured. The organization also supports new technologies emerging in medicine.

President of the Life Line Foundation; Faina Zakharovaspoke about the challenges facing charitable foundations now and about the prospects for their activities in Russia.

— The Line of Life Foundation turns 18 in June. How did you get started in philanthropy, how did you make the decision that affected your life?

— Indeed, my path to charity began from afar. At first, I worked at the Research Institute for Environmental Protection and coordinated the activities of nature reserves and national parks. I am a geographer by training. My dissertation was related to highland landscape mapping. There is no such reserve on the territory of the former Soviet Union, wherever I am: from deserts to Kamchatka, Chukotka. She worked in the Caucasus, Tien Shan, Pamir and other unique natural ecosystems. I created a map of my trips, I got 53 countries and almost all regions of Russia!

And in 1991 I went on the first international expedition to Wrangel Island. Arctic, minus 35-38 degrees — happiest time. It is hard to imagine, but this is an incredible icy beauty. The ice is white, matte, like a shell, powerful wild animals — polar bears, musk ox — it is very beautiful, it is a new knowledge of the world, life, oneself. The conditions are tough, but you never regret — because what you see around, what you participate in — this is incredible.

— You are called one of the founders of the WWF, is that true?

— Quite right. At this time, WWF — I was invited to create this organization in Russia. When I started working at the World Wide Fund for Nature, there were only 3 of us. This is also a wonderful huge stage of life: extraordinary projects for the conservation of the tiger, and projects related to reserves and national parks, and projects on global climate change. I worked at WWF from 1994 to 2005. 

— When is it time to move on and why?

— It may sound a little high-flown, but I — a man of mission, I always have a clear sense of where I need to move, and it is impossible to lead me astray from this path. One day I realized that after working at WWF for ten years, I did everything I could, completely solved the internal and organizational tasks. At the same time, I felt that I could raise a new project. My internal request was immediately answered — in 2005, I was invited to lead the Life Line rescue program for seriously ill children.

— What has changed today in the work of charitable foundations? 

— Of course, the global situation, first with the pandemic, then with the sanctions imposed on businesses in Russia, has also affected our work. So, due to the difficult current situation, at the end of March 2022, the global and only manufacturer of technologies for cell therapy for cancer patients and bone marrow transplantation — The German company Miltenyi Biotec stopped supplying its products to Russia. As a result, small patients deprived of access to these technologies will have to be treated by doctors only with high-dose chemotherapy, which in the vast majority of cases will lead to their death. Stocks of necessary components will last only a few months. Therefore, now our task is to raise funds in order to help as many children with cancer as possible who are waiting for cell therapy. 

Unfortunately, many large companies that have been our partners and members of the corporate charity club for a long time have left the market (Master Card, Henkel, Lego, ISUS, pws have left us). Fortunately, many stayed. Our foundation has conducted more than 60 major co-branding campaigns within the framework of a socially oriented business. Thanks to these actions, thousands of children were cured. For example, X5 Group has developed and launched its own trade mark — “Kindness Candy”. For several years now, 5 rubles from each sold lollipop has been transferred to the fund for the implementation of medical programs. Thanks to a small candy, 130 children were able to receive the necessary expensive treatment.

And today, if you can imagine, there are more than 50,000 children behind my back, whose lives we managed to save or improve qualitatively thanks to our help.  

— How do you assess the prospects for the activities of charitable foundations in Russia?

— Now we have an important task ahead of us — make charity systemic. We have been saving children for 18 years and supporting new technologies that appear in medicine. Charitable Foundation — it is, in fact, a connecting puzzle between the state, business and society. Our expertise in the interaction between patients and the medical system is in demand, it is more important than ever for assessing the social effect of the activities of charitable organizations in Russia. 

This social effect of charity has already been calculated in many countries. For our society and the system of traditional values, this still sounds defiant. 

At the same time we want charity to become a way of life. When a child is brought up from childhood in the understanding that he should help, to the best of his ability, to make the world better and kinder, then children who grew up on such an upbringing begin to help not emotionally through impulse, but consciously.

Rate the material